Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction The judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Sunil Kumar @...
Abandonment of Trade Marks of Companies in Liquidation and Limits of Company Court Jurisdiction: Commentary on Mr. Boman R. Irani v. The Official Liquidator of M/s Ideal Jawa (India) Ltd. (in...
Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad I. Introduction The decision of the...
Constraining the Doctrine of Pleasure in Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court, 25 November 2025) I. Introduction The decision in...
Mandatory Victim Compensation and Scientific Blood Grouping in Criminal Trials: A Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka, Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench), 26 November 2025 1. Introduction...
Eviction as an Extraordinary but Permissible Remedy under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Commentary on Smt. Soumya v. Smt. Ratnakumari 1. Introduction The decision of the Karnataka High Court...
No Limitation on Constitutional Duty to Compensate for Unlawful State Use of Private Land – Commentary on Sri H.P. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the decision...
Withholding Salary for Work Actually Performed Amounts to Unconstitutional “Begar” under Article 23: A Commentary on Shri Anil s/o Mallappa Kanawade v. State of Karnataka Court: High Court of...
Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court’s Division Bench, comprising...
No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order 1. Introduction The decision in Lakshmamma v. State of Karnataka, WP No....
Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission Court: High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru Case: Writ...
Prima Facie Proof of Unsoundness of Mind as a Precondition for Reference under Section 105 Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 – Commentary on Mr. Alphonsa Saldana v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction This...
RERA Orders Not Directly Executable as Civil Court Decrees: Commentary on Mantri Developer Pvt. Ltd. v. Snil Pathiyam Veetil & Ors., Karnataka High Court (31 October 2025) I. Introduction The...
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation...
Mechanical Application of Age Cut‑Off in Compassionate Appointment Schemes is Impermissible: Indigence Assessment Mandatory 1. Introduction The decision in Saroja W/o. Ganeshrao N. Kondai v. Managing...
Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments 1. Introduction The judgment in Sri J Ramesh Chand v. Union of...
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims Introduction In X Corp v. Union of...
Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment Case: Shri Lokanna S/o. Ramappa Biradarpatil and...
Mens Rea at Inception as the Decisive Test in Cheating Allegations from Commercial Contracts: Karnataka High Court Quashes 420/506 FIR Case: Sailen Das v. State by Kodigehalli Police Station & A One...