Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Karnataka High Court Case Commentaries

Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka

Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Due Process and Police Surveillance of “Rowdy Sheeters”: Commentary on Sunil Kumar @ Silent Sunil v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction The judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Sunil Kumar @...
Abandonment of Trade Marks of Companies in Liquidation and Jurisdictional Limits under Section 446: Commentary on Boman R. Irani v. Official Liquidator of Ideal Jawa (India) Ltd.

Abandonment of Trade Marks of Companies in Liquidation and Jurisdictional Limits under Section 446: Commentary on Boman R. Irani v. Official Liquidator of Ideal Jawa (India) Ltd.

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Abandonment of Trade Marks of Companies in Liquidation and Limits of Company Court Jurisdiction: Commentary on Mr. Boman R. Irani v. The Official Liquidator of M/s Ideal Jawa (India) Ltd. (in...
Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad

Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Preventive Externment under Section 163 BNSS: Emergency, Proportionality and Natural Justice in Sri Adrushya Kadeshwara Swamiji v. Deputy Commissioner, Dharwad I. Introduction The decision of the...
Doctrine of Pleasure, Article 14 and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka

Doctrine of Pleasure, Article 14 and Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Constraining the Doctrine of Pleasure in Law Officer Appointments: Commentary on Sunil S/o Annappa Sank v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court, 25 November 2025) I. Introduction The decision in...
Mandatory Victim Compensation & Forensic Blood Grouping: Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka

Mandatory Victim Compensation & Forensic Blood Grouping: Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 27, 2025
Mandatory Victim Compensation and Scientific Blood Grouping in Criminal Trials: A Commentary on Bhimappa v. State of Karnataka, Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench), 26 November 2025 1. Introduction...
Eviction as an Extraordinary but Permissible Remedy under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Commentary on Soumya v. Ratnakumari

Eviction as an Extraordinary but Permissible Remedy under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Commentary on Soumya v. Ratnakumari

Date: Nov 26, 2025
Eviction as an Extraordinary but Permissible Remedy under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act: Commentary on Smt. Soumya v. Smt. Ratnakumari 1. Introduction The decision of the Karnataka High Court...
No Limitation on Constitutional Duty to Compensate for Unlawful State Use of Private Land – Commentary on H.P. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka

No Limitation on Constitutional Duty to Compensate for Unlawful State Use of Private Land – Commentary on H.P. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 26, 2025
No Limitation on Constitutional Duty to Compensate for Unlawful State Use of Private Land – Commentary on Sri H.P. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the decision...
Withholding Salary for Work Performed as Unconstitutional “Begar” under Article 23: Commentary on Shri Anil s/o Mallappa Kanawade v. State of Karnataka

Withholding Salary for Work Performed as Unconstitutional “Begar” under Article 23: Commentary on Shri Anil s/o Mallappa Kanawade v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Withholding Salary for Work Actually Performed Amounts to Unconstitutional “Begar” under Article 23: A Commentary on Shri Anil s/o Mallappa Kanawade v. State of Karnataka Court: High Court of...
Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement

Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Autonomous Government-Created Bodies and Pension under KCSRs: Karnataka High Court Clarifies Non-Automatic Pension Entitlement 1. Introduction The Karnataka High Court’s Division Bench, comprising...
No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order

No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order

Date: Nov 19, 2025
No Vested Right to Succession or Transfer of Fair Price Shop Authorizations under Rule 13 of the Karnataka PDS Control Order 1. Introduction The decision in Lakshmamma v. State of Karnataka, WP No....
Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission

Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission

Date: Nov 13, 2025
Locus Standi of RTI Activists to Seek Third‑Party Examination Answer Scripts: Commentary on Intak Raju N v. Karnataka Information Commission Court: High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru Case: Writ...

    Prima Facie Proof of Unsoundness of Mind as a Precondition for Reference under Section 105
    Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 – Commentary on Mr. Alphonsa Saldana v. State of Karnataka

Prima Facie Proof of Unsoundness of Mind as a Precondition for Reference under Section 105 Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 – Commentary on Mr. Alphonsa Saldana v. State of Karnataka

Date: Nov 4, 2025
Prima Facie Proof of Unsoundness of Mind as a Precondition for Reference under Section 105 Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 – Commentary on Mr. Alphonsa Saldana v. State of Karnataka 1. Introduction This...
RERA Orders Not Directly Executable as Civil Court Decrees: Commentary on Mantri Developer Pvt. Ltd. v. Snil Pathiyam Veetil & Ors. (Karnataka High Court, 31 October 2025)

RERA Orders Not Directly Executable as Civil Court Decrees: Commentary on Mantri Developer Pvt. Ltd. v. Snil Pathiyam Veetil & Ors. (Karnataka High Court, 31 October 2025)

Date: Nov 1, 2025
RERA Orders Not Directly Executable as Civil Court Decrees: Commentary on Mantri Developer Pvt. Ltd. v. Snil Pathiyam Veetil & Ors., Karnataka High Court (31 October 2025) I. Introduction The...
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation for revisions

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Holiday-Extension for Quarry Lease Renewals under KMMC Rules: Karnataka High Court harmonizes Rule 21(2) with Sections 9 and 10 of the General Clauses Act and reaffirms communication-based limitation...
Mechanical Application of Age Cut‑Off in Compassionate Appointment Schemes is Impermissible: Indigence Assessment Mandatory

Mechanical Application of Age Cut‑Off in Compassionate Appointment Schemes is Impermissible: Indigence Assessment Mandatory

Date: Oct 15, 2025
Mechanical Application of Age Cut‑Off in Compassionate Appointment Schemes is Impermissible: Indigence Assessment Mandatory 1. Introduction The decision in Saroja W/o. Ganeshrao N. Kondai v. Managing...
Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments

Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments

Date: Oct 14, 2025
Karnataka High Court on Coercive GST Recovery During Search: Limits of Section 74(5) and Right to Refund of Involuntary DRC‑03 Payments 1. Introduction The judgment in Sri J Ramesh Chand v. Union of...
Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences — Karnataka High Court in Vishwanath v. State of Karnataka

Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences — Karnataka High Court in Vishwanath v. State of Karnataka

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Gazette re-appointment not needed on Drugs Inspector’s transfer; Sessions trial requires Magistrate’s committal; Section 468 CrPC bar inapplicable where joint trial involves graver Drugs Act offences...
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Affirming Section 79(3)(b) Takedown Powers and Rule 3(1)(d) Validity: Karnataka High Court upholds the Sahyog Portal and limits intermediaries’ Article 19 claims Introduction In X Corp v. Union of...
Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment

Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Mandamus to Enforce Section 77 RFCTLARR: Collector must deposit compensation within 30 days of award; quantum disputes no ground to withhold payment Case: Shri Lokanna S/o. Ramappa Biradarpatil and...
Mens Rea at Inception as the Decisive Test in Cheating Allegations from Commercial Contracts: Karnataka High Court Quashes 420/506 FIR (SAILEN DAS v. State, 11 Sep 2025)

Mens Rea at Inception as the Decisive Test in Cheating Allegations from Commercial Contracts: Karnataka High Court Quashes 420/506 FIR (SAILEN DAS v. State, 11 Sep 2025)

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Mens Rea at Inception as the Decisive Test in Cheating Allegations from Commercial Contracts: Karnataka High Court Quashes 420/506 FIR Case: Sailen Das v. State by Kodigehalli Police Station & A One...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert